While it might be true that technology has substituted the place of human thought in working out the tasks, it is however going too far in outright stating that technology has deteriorated human thinking power. We can clearly perceive the extent to which technology has revolutionised the world and our day to day life. On the contrast to the statement made, it is the technology which has enabled us to see in the dark, record our ideas in a more permanent way, allowed for sharing of the ideas and many more. If it weren’t for the technology, we wouldn’t have found medical cures and deadly diseases like Polio, Small Pox, Plague would still be prevalent.
Modern technology like internet has conspicuously eased and aided the scientific research in many ways like scientific community collaboration on a global front, conducting the experiments, recording and sharing the ideas. It is this same technology which has enabled us to expand the human frontiers above and beyond our thinking capacity. We are now able to investigate the atmospheric conditions on other planets like Mars which would definitely be left as a dream without the technology. It is only through the communication technology are we able to talk to our near and dear ones once they are away from us and most recently we are even able to see them while talking through a video call.
In fact technology has freed up sometime for the human thinking capacity by performing the mundane tasks with ease and effectiveness. It would have been a night mare to perform some routine tasks like account book keeping, warehouse management for a human and computers are a perfect fit to such tasks, additionally they ensure error free and reliable results provided we do no wrong on our side of course.
Technology has also has a contribution to the field of arts, it goes without saying that arts are what keep us humans human and in fact some scientists claim that some time indulging in arts has increased their thinking capacity. In that regard technology has dramatically buttressed the reach of arts in the form of TV, Radio, Internet etc. and modern methods like computer graphics have really opened new doors to how we can be mesmerised by the human imagination.
With all these being said, it is true that some of us have lost ourselves in the vast ocean of this modern technology which might sometimes feel totally overwhelming and unnecessary. For example upon being used to take help of our hand calculators, we might feel it a difficult once we need to do simple calculations by ourselves, we feel all lost and bored if our internet doesn’t function for a few minutes and all those. As it has always been, it is not mere technology which deteriorates or enhances our thinking capacity, it is on the person in whose hands it is. For instance we can use the same technology to learn new things online and we can use the same thing for wasting hours and hours of our precious time by in indulging in otherwise less useful things. Nevertheless, it would not be wise to disdain technology after all the challenges we have solved using it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: nightmare
...and effectiveness. It would have been a night mare to perform some routine tasks like acco...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, still, while, after all, for example, for instance, in fact, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2598.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82899628253 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80251788466 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503717472119 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 825.3 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0716770191 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8888888889 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119575413757 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430593922152 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418465511345 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782227511363 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403241895692 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.