As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology has surely created a huge impact on our day to day lives, Everything which we are using in our daily lives has made our daily lives very easy. Nowadays every person starts their day with using such inventions and end it using the same. From easy tasks like preparing a cup of coffee, commuting to work, ordering food, buying groceries, et cetera to complex tasks like developing software, making algorithms, processing data, et cetera everything is done with the use of technology. Technology has made our lives very easy but it has surely not done one thing that is deteriorating human’s ability to think.
Technology has helped humans to do every task which was unimaginable in the 19th century. Technology brought humans from using horses and carriages for traveling to motor powered vehicles. By doing all our daily tasks very efficiently and easily it given humans more time and space to think and innovate, technology has not stopped the growth of human brain, but the opposite.
Technology has freed human imagination. It gave our imagination the environment it needed and this thing has given birth to many amazing ideas. Before the invention of internet no one thought that communicating to other people would be so easy and after the arrival of world wide web in the 90s it all changed people started innovating, one after another they came up with amazing ideas about what can be done using the internet, for example- In 1994 Jeff Bezos, a grad student from Princeton University thought about selling books on the internet, he created a website “amazon.com” and now amazon is one of the largest and most profitable E-Commerce Company of the world and sells more than 600,000 products.
Technology has helped humans to proliferate their imagination. It has also accelerated the growth rate of the humans. We should not forget that everything that we have right now is also created by us. Technology has not deteriorated the human’s ability to think, it has changed the way humans used to think, off course in a positive way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 578, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...it has surely not done one thing that is deteriorating human's ability to th...
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...h was unimaginable in the 19th century. Technology brought humans from using horses and ca...
Line 13, column 325, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...he way humans used to think, off course in a positive way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04057971014 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82579114022 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539130434783 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 130.173902523 60.3974514979 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 124.214285714 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208747825499 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812642164709 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740131616011 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13478565366 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544388965628 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.