People today are too individualistic. Instead of pursuing self-centered, separate goals, people need to understand that satisfaction comes from working for the greater good of the family, the Community or society as a whole.

When it comes to satisfaction, people in general believe that it lies to a condition when they initially set a goal, contrive a plan and make efforts to accomplish their goal. While their dream eventually comes true, they are full of excitement and content, and that moment is “satisfaction”. Therefore, it depends on people’s dream which generates satisfaction.
To begin with, we, humans, all have our own dreams since living in the current society requires several basic conditions that keep us survived. To illustrate this point, consider the most common goal among societies, to earn money as superfluous as possible. Why we desire money so eagerly? The most significant reason is that living means spending money. Maintaining basic human health, such as eating food, drinking water, or commuting between home and working places, paying electricity bills, water bills, gas bills, phone bills, all of above instances require spending money. Apart from them, it is our instinct to consider save all of our salaries, yet our salaries are not sufficient enough. As a result, the most pervasive dream among our society is to have a lot of money. In order to gain more money, people start to set their individualistic goals to compete for the least arduous but well-paid jobs. When they get such offer, satisfaction teems with them. Hence, achieving personal goals does indeed generate a sense of self-content.
Moreover, when people have sufficient money for them to live in a wealthy life-style, they start to consider their reputation. They covet fame, which lasts through eternity, even when they no longer exist in this world. Therefore, some of them donate money to cities for building libraries named after them, or they donate to academic institution to improve their facilities. Others devote themselves into communities or societies by joining assemblies or associations, such as saving endangered species, arousing societies to conserve resources or energy, or simply clearing our costal lines together. All of them could serve as a step stone for establishing their name, or fame, forever.
In conclusion, not only did contribute to the family, the community or society as a whole could acquire satisfaction, but also did achieve individualistic goal could as well.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30494505495 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01585168226 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.740449438202 540% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.601149098 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.631578947 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125677234754 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376100367973 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293255343181 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819283307422 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127671946058 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.