In this set of materials, the reading passage explores three reasons that some archaeologists believe that the coin is not genuine historical evidence, and the professor's lecture deals with the same topic. However, she casts doubts on these reasons, and in the lecture, she provides three specific points to substantiate her opinion.
To begin with, the reading passage suggests that the distance of the Native American site where the coin was discovered is far from other documented sites of Norse, the professor argues in the lecture that this point is relatively groundless. This is because the Native American traveled to faraway places in order to obtain materials, and they brought them home. As a result, the great distance from Norse settlements could be explained. Clearly, the professor's argument refutes its counterpart in the reading.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that there is no other coins found at the Canadian sites where the Norse inhabited, the professor asserts that the North did not live in permanent settlements. She supports this point with the fact that the North packed up all valuable properties, which included silver coins, and brought them back to Europe where they later used there. Therefore, it accounts for there is no other coins have been found.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that silver coins were useless to the Norse whereas the professor contends that silver coins were not recognized as money compared to current common notion, rather they were seen as attractive and appealing materials. Then she explains that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that necklaces were used for trading instead of using silver coins.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 452, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ements could be explained. Clearly, the professors argument refutes its counterpart in the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'as a result', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.229235880399 0.261695866417 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.189368770764 0.158904122519 119% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0664451827243 0.0723426182421 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0498338870432 0.0435111971325 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0398671096346 0.0277247811725 144% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126245847176 0.128828473217 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0431893687708 0.0370669169778 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56770547499 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0232558139535 0.0208969081088 111% => OK
Particles: 0.00996677740864 0.00154638098197 645% => OK
Determiners: 0.126245847176 0.128158765124 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00332225913621 0.0158828679856 21% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0132890365449 0.0114777025283 116% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1695.0 1645.83664459 103% => OK
No of words: 273.0 271.125827815 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20879120879 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384615384615 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.300366300366 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208791208791 0.187439937562 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.113553113553 0.113142543107 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56770547499 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578754578755 0.539623497131 107% => OK
Word variations: 60.2992170275 53.8517498576 112% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 24.8181818182 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7881649283 49.3711431718 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.090909091 132.220823453 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 0.878197800319 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 54.8548118548 50.5018328374 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.42857142857 1.90840788429 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.746029948355 0.549887131256 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131942166704 0.142949733639 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0815059080455 0.0787303798458 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.632043752645 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169425461675 0.139662658121 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.336480307914 0.266732575781 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169771498301 0.103435571967 164% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.43723124218 0.414875509568 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0588025732615 0.0530846634433 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.525117528696 0.40443939384 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104315611116 0.0528353158467 197% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.