People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers
The issue statement says that people who make decisions driven by their emotions and afterwards justifying these decisions by corroborating with logics are poor decision makers. I completely adhere to this statement and the reasons for my adherence are : firstly, the decisions based on emotions generally leads the man to pitfall. Secondly, these decisions are many-a-times biased and finally, these are quick and ultimately leads to chaos. These reasons along with examples are delineated below :
Firstly, the decisions which are taken on sake of emotions always have subtle dangers, which ultimately leads the man towards pitfall. First of all what are the emotional decisions, these are the decisions which are taken instantly by heart, in this there is no cognizant thinking and no cerebral activity is involved, so basically these are illogical. However, a man is social animal. HE has to live in the society so he has to take care of not offending the sentiments of the other people but a great leader is the one which keeps all his emotions aside and take quick decisions. Consider the example of Maharaja Ranjit Singh of Punjab, when he was young his father took some decisions which were logical like of scolding and deriding him in front of the others but that didn't hampered the progress of great King of India. So, these logical decisions always give desired outcomes.
Secondly, emotional decisions are biased and are detrimental to the other people of the society. These are taken on the heat of the moment and quick and even create a great chaos among people. Many wars in the archaic times were due to this reasons only which ultimately leads to myriad number of casualties and huge losses of property. For instance, US attack on Hiroshima, Japan. Even in recent times, ISIS taking decisions based on emotions and later explain these decisions with logics to pervade these quisling things among people. But honest muslims still take decisions logically that is why they are far away form these kind of activities.
Finally, sometimes it also justifiable to take decisions based on emotions rather than logically. Consider the case of Iker casillas an eminent football player, he got out of form due to the age but the club still let him play at Real Madrid, even though they lost many matches but the club and supporters paid him a tribute just because of him the club won many silverwares before. So, even emotional decisions are justifiable sometimes because
So at last I would like to conclude that decisions based on emotions are very detrimental to the man and even to the society as a whole and later justifying these with logics is a very illogical thing. Therefore, a man always take pragmatic decisions rather than quixotically. The reasons for my stand along with examples are explained above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 774, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ing him in front of the others but that didnt hampered the progress of great King of ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y wars in the archaic times were due to this reasons only which ultimately leads to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ally that is why they are far away form these kind of activities. Finally, sometimes it a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isions are justifiable sometimes because So at last I would like to conclude that...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, as to, for instance, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2353.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98516949153 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58022397656 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476694915254 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.74537786 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.65 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414107723614 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143245518547 0.0831039109588 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149145716697 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259694753123 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10276652502 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.