As soon as a scandal breaks out, "Breaking News" starts flashing on television channels. A lot of news papers starts printing out the story. It becomes the prime talk among public. People start doing their indepth research on the back story. And soon it emerges to become a state interest. Scandals do have their way of bring all eyes to it. The claim made in the statement is that, no other speaker or reformer could bring public attention to problems as a scandal could. It appears to be quite extreme to say so. Thought scandals gather mass people's attention, even public speakers do have the ability to do so.
In a country like india with massive population, there was a lot of corruption in government offices during the ruling party. The news was widely known among people. There were scandals popping out frequently. But none of them, could spur a national movement as by a single person. A common retired man in his 80's, started a moment, against the ruling party. By doing simple and effective demonstration, he could gather all the attention of the country. It became so effective that, since the next election, it didnt come to power. This draws a sharp inference that, if a common man can bring out attention to problems of nation so could any speaker or reformer.
The observed phenomenon about scandals is that, as soon as a scandal break, there is a lot of information available for consumption but the real usefulness is assessed if an action is taken upon it. Here the speaker or reformer plays an important role who are pursuant about finding solution to the problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reformer could bring public attention to problems as a scandal could. It appears ...
^^
Line 2, column 511, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ctive that, since the next election, it didnt come to power. This draws a sharp infer...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 277.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7761732852 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62882821642 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584837545126 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0948500861 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6315789474 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.5789473684 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.578947368421 5.21951772744 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142277448391 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039687768829 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540724741576 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915760354144 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214525475387 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.8971910112 38% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.