Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Whenever, a person is fall from duty or ambition, he/she always try to comeback in better ways. A different way can motivate the person for solving the problems, yet many things can be the reason of demotivation or frustation. The promt states that scandals are more helpful than any speaker or reformer to focus our attention on problems. Though many people get success after getting scandals, maximum cases it creates worst situation to get away from problems.
To begin, scandals give a very bad effect on peoples mind. Getting a problem makes a human mind more frustated, creates a lot of complexity in his/her life. Scandals works as catalyst to make worsen the condition. Peoples' disapprovals enervate the mental strenth. As example,a politician always try to hide himself when he become unsuccessful in such action and publicly criticized for something. Strong support from a speaker or a reformer can help him to regain the loosing strengths and to take further actions to overcome this problem.
Moreover, a person, who is socially active, would be isolated cause of scandals. Even suicidal attempts are common scenario because of this reason. Not being socialize makes a person mentally weak and loneliness takes the person in a depression. Concealing the scandals and proper conduct of others can reduce the affects of the problem. A celebrity need the support of her fans. If they stay with his/her scandals, he/she never go back previous condition or better.
However, negative effects sometimes helps to happen positive cases. But every people isn't strong enough to reverse the situation. He/she must need help form others which can be provided by a reformer or speaker. So, it's clear that scandals might be useful to focus our attention on problems but not more than speakers or reformer ever could.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...ll from duty or ambition, he/she always try to comeback in better ways. A different...
^^^
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: TO_COMEBACK[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to come back'?
Suggestion: to come back
...rom duty or ambition, he/she always try to comeback in better ways. A different way can mot...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'creates the worst'.
Suggestion: creates the worst
...fter getting scandals, maximum cases it creates worst situation to get away from problems. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
... enervate the mental strenth. As example,a politician always try to hide himself w...
^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'goes'.
Suggestion: goes
...tay with his/her scandals, he/she never go back previous condition or better. How...
^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...happen positive cases. But every people isnt strong enough to reverse the situation....
^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reverse the situation. He/she must need help form others which can be provided b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 298.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10738255034 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61260953278 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634228187919 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6703134463 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.21951772744 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256515460054 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066524618603 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11618573269 0.0758088955206 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150009949944 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890345632347 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.