Do you think Martin Luther King's "I Had a Dream" speech would have had as much of an effect without his supporters working to release the scandals done to the African-American people during that time? Without people learning about critical information behind wrongs done to people and the planet, even the most eloquent speaker cannot move people to act against these practices. Some might disagree by listing all of the speakers and leaders that have transformed societies, but it wasn't done without key actions taken to reveal sordid practices. Throughout history, these actions have allowed for people to realize the scandals behind what they believed to be the most beneficial.
Since the dawn of time, certain groups of people have been capricious (expedient) to a point that they don't care how much it costs others, but certain individuals used their skills to reveal these scandals to create change. An example of this is when political cartoons were developed. Headstrong men used their artistic skill to transform their media from plain humor to satire that vilified the true enemies. Pompous, rich men were debased to nothingness when it was revealed how much they had taken from the people that most trusted them. This allowed for even the illiterate to realize what was going on and take action to stop it. A speaker could have worked just as hard as these artists, but not reveal the audacious actions being done to as large of an audience.
Scandals allow for people to see actions as they truly are, and give them reason enough to fight against it. There is currently a plan to install a new pipeline directly in the middle of a Native American reservation in Oklahoma, and at this hour there are people camped beside the tractors being used to tear up the ground as a protest. These people are doing this in order to draw attention to this violation of personal property instead of sitting by and watching their land be destroyed. Sure, a speech from the state senator might have ruffled a few feathers, but this action is truly revealing a scandal that has led to preventative action. Actions like these can transform decisions made like these that would have a negative impact on ecological and societal environments.
Speakers and reformers can actually be full of trickery and lies, which can sway an audience away from the truth. Think of the Watergate Scandal. The President of the United States was one of the most eloquent speakers of the time, but this scandal revealed him to be very different than how his words portrayed him. If this scandal was not revealed, then the world would still view him to be an honest, trustworthy man. Words can deceive, and only actions can really reveal the truth and produce results.
In a world full of scandals, the truth can only be revealed by the people that take action and allow for others to also visualize it. This can be done in so many more ways than just speeches or political reforms. Even the simplest actions can transform perspectives for the better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 421, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...actices. Some might disagree by listing all of the speakers and leaders that have transfor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...that have transformed societies, but it wasnt done without key actions taken to revea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...pricious expedient to a point that they dont care how much it costs others, but cert...
^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...andal revealed him to be very different than how his words portrayed him. If this sc...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'still', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.219081272085 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.190812720848 0.157235817809 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0742049469965 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.047703180212 0.0497285424764 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0406360424028 0.0444667217837 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.102473498233 0.12292977631 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0600706713781 0.0406280797675 148% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.47546909755 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0459363957597 0.030933414821 149% => OK
Particles: 0.0017667844523 0.0016655270985 106% => OK
Determiners: 0.114840989399 0.0997080785238 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0265017667845 0.0249443105267 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0212014134276 0.0148568991511 143% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3047.0 2732.02544248 112% => OK
No of words: 519.0 452.878318584 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87090558767 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.342967244701 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.252408477842 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169556840077 0.200843997647 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0886319845857 0.132149295362 67% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47546909755 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 219.290929204 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50289017341 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 59.9340562794 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5652173913 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5594962373 59.4972553346 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.47826087 141.124799967 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5652173913 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.347826086957 0.674092028746 52% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 47.8060651755 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.36708860759 1.64882698954 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257250487891 0.391690518653 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109820044916 0.123202303941 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0736997677414 0.077325440228 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.51402562847 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118281945032 0.149214159877 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942936134815 0.161403998019 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411499352897 0.0892212321368 46% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.405790509116 0.385218514788 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0677205329159 0.0692045440612 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174333111445 0.275328986314 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033813318872 0.0653680567796 52% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.30420353982 264% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 12.0 3.66592920354 327% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.