Scandals act as both side of a coin. In one side can be useful and it can open society eyes to the reality and help to the progresses of it but not in any field of the society. In the other side of this coin it can hurt to society spirit and grab peace from society.
For instance scandals in politics may distrust people to the government. Some scandals from prominent individuals that are in the head of government can destroy trust in that society. People attitude will change and they trust less than before. Even it can affect on their choice and the society tolerate severe hurt.
In the other side scandals are useful in politics and it can help people to riot against it and forced the leader to wise the government and find a solution.
Always scandals may not be useful and these scandals may be lie. For instance some groups for their benefits in an election try to destroy the figure of the other group. So under this circumstance, It is hard to judge them and passing time can helpful.
Even some media for collecting partisans publish some fake scandals like a singer's drug addiction or athlete alcoholic addiction so it can not be main criteria for judgment and under this circumstance, scandal is not so much a useful tool to focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Admittedly, to some extent, scandals in one society help famous people to behave carefully than before. To sum up Hearing fake scandals like famous actor's drug addiction is not useful and it can not focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could so I'm disagree with scandal usefulness
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...hey trust less than before. Even it can affect on their choice and the society tolerate s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...se the government and find a solution. Always scandals may not be useful and these sc...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 281, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...at no speaker or reformer ever could so Im disagree with scandal usefulness
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, even so, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61433447099 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44067158253 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464163822526 0.4932671777 94% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6122281771 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195282652838 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627926796037 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728263278532 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108446726882 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066380225145 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 100.480337079 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.