School should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood.
Schools play an immense role in a student's life. It helps shape their thoughts, encourages them to pursue goals and provides them with immense opportunities to advance their interests. However, schools do play a significant role in instilling students with values such as honesty, integrity and working in a cooperative environment. But can they do better? Extensive surveys spread across a large pool of adults have shown that schools were an integral part of their upbringing. The values they presented have stood the test of time and have proven beneficial in their life.
Working in a cooperative environment is a trait every adult should possess. Whether the adult is working in a large multinational corporation or academia, spreading thoughts constructively is required. Schools are a great place to learn these values. By encouraging group projects, student-committees (headed by students themselves), and sports participation schools can ensure that a student learns to thrive under competition and cooperate with others.
Handling stress and failure another important aspect of life. Schools should spread awareness about the symptoms of depression and anxiety. By conducting informative discussions, giving them real-life examples of innovators like Edison and Tesla, who had their ups and downs, schools can ensure that the students are well prepared for failures and that they will combat such instances with reason and a positive outlook.
A natural question arises is whether the parents should be the ones educating and reforming their children. While advantages to doing so are many, for example, parents know their children better than the school authorities and children are known to be greatly influenced by them. They also have more time to make such efforts. However, there are many examples wherein the incompetence of the parents has had a negative influence on their children. According to a recent survey, 30% of the families in The United States are battling with family issues. In such cases, it is more constructive for schools to shape children. Well defined curriculums can be framed to keep the teachers regulated and provide a structure to non-academic education.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that parents and schools should actively and constructively participate in shaping a child's future. After all, they are the pillars upon whom mankind will be dependent. Instilling positive thoughts in a child can go a long way in securing a better future.
Comments
Not a bad job, but as for me…
Not a bad job, but as for me the main task of the school is to socialize students and help them in the future. The main goal is to provide all the tools you need and create an environment without racial profiling, I did my essay on this based on examples https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/racial-profiling/ where I mentioned the school as the main problem of this. The situation is much better now than it was ten years ago, but it's still a problem that we need to get rid of in society by getting children used to treating people for their actions and not for what they were born to do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
Schools play an immense role in a students life. It helps shape their thoughts, en...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, still, well, while, after all, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40512820513 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97178934094 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55641025641 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.9983796687 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.652173913 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9565217391 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34782608696 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258043085304 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665580331128 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552101629693 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126893799155 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435651770777 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.