Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Nowadays it’s almost impossible to build an imaginative picture of a remote corner of our planet not touched or influenced to some extent by a human hand. We as the industrial and technological revolutions over the last century have been developing at an unprecedented scale and so as have the downside aspects of these processes. However, there are still a blizzard of arguments among countries and groups with contentious views concerning whether it is a high time to take certain steps for protecting endangered species and their shrinking habitats or not. While one might be absolutely convinced that there is not exigency for this, a number of recently published explorations aver this is in fact a case.
For delving into this subject, let give a chain of events that made what they made. First of all, it must be claimed that the 20th century was a century of medical breakouts which changed the face of medicine forever, for instant, the chanced discovery of penicillin by Alexzander Fleming or x-rays by William Roentgen etc. Never in the recorded history of humanity the rate of recovering from dreadful diseases which recently were mortal has been so high as it is today. The ultimate aftermath of it has turned out to be fatal for our environment since from the beginning of 20th century the population started growth on a significant pace.
Inevitably, there are a bunch of doom and gloom scenarios by the prophets which forecast the considerable increase of population in the foreseeable future and as a result we would continue exerting severe pressure in finite resources of our planet, damaging the ecological balance via producing a huge amount of carbon dioxide emissions from year to year and deforesting the left pristine environment. Looking back to the introduction from these facts it should come as no surprise that there has no left a place on the Earth which are not impacted by our activity and as well if even one might claim that this place is, it is improbable to prove.
Having analyzed all the mentioned above occurrences, it can be easily concluded that our civilization is in charge of its activity and all outcomes of it. There is no need to separate species, continents etc. with purpose to protect one and leave the other on the death since the planet has only one ecosystem and if something is wrong in one place, the rest of them are about to get irreparable damages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eming or x-rays by William Roentgen etc. Never in the recorded history of humanit...
^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'bunches'?
Suggestion: bunches
...ificant pace. Inevitably, there are a bunch of doom and gloom scenarios by the prop...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, still, well, while, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87591240876 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78618874481 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586374695864 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1994255584 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.153846154 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6153846154 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0681409544866 0.243740707755 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.019832200479 0.0831039109588 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233609534185 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0369692341682 0.150359130593 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165463527258 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.