Some people believe that goverment funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people.Some people believe that goverment funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people.
In my opinion, I mostly agree that government funding of the arts is essential to make sure the arts can flourish and be available to all people. However, the government should choose appropriate artists to fund.
First, the government funding of the art helps an unfamous artist to live. Most artists live a hard life before they become famous. For example, Van Gon was poor before his demise. If the government provided Van Gogh with the fund, Van Gogh could create more masterpieces for the world. As a result, the government funding of the arts is necessary for a country to cultivate their art industry.
Besides, the government funding of the art makes arts nurture people.
A man is different from a beast because he has the sense about what is beautiful. Without the fund, there are few artworks available to the residents of a country, and the arts could inspire few people to enrich their minds. If arts are unavailable to the citizens of a country, it can harm the productivity of the creative industry.
However, the government should choose the appropriate artists to fund. Some artists are wealthy enough to sustain their lives. For example, Ang Lee, a movie director, is famous in Taiwan and earns tons of cash without the help of government funding. If the government funds Ang Lee, it will preclude the fund for the artists in need. Without the fund, these poor artists will have no choice but choose to give their career as an artist. Therefore, the government must put their fund into those artists in need.
To sum up, without the help from the government, it is hard to make arts in a country outstanding and cultivate the mind of its residents. Nevertheless, the fund must go to the artists who need most.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-25 | hotcom1023 | 50 | view |
- You have enough money to purchase either a house or a business. Which would you choose to buy? Give specific reasons to explain your choice. 70
- Some people believe that goverment funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people.Some people believe that goverment funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be availab 50
- TPO 21 - Genetically modified trees 73
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to appropriate'
Suggestion: to appropriate
.... However, the government should choose appropriate artists to fund. First, the governme...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... productivity of the creative industry. However, the government should choose th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 301.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79069767442 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59702932565 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491694352159 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0649343423 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.8947368421 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281904589172 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101611357476 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114097616235 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194387502371 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102544240636 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 48.8420337079 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.38706741573 82% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.