There are both positive and negative aspects of forbidden some information from the political leaders to the public people. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely select to agree with this statement. It is my firm belief people how have a high responsibilities in their country know valuable information which can make a fluctuate in the street, so they have to withhold it for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To start, leaders know enormous number of information everyday about the country which includes politics and economy. For instance, in some cases these is information related to the king or the president of the country, so these acquaintance should not be publish to the public because it may put the president's life to the hazard or risk. Moreover, everything in the world is related to money, so any wrong or terrible knowledge may lead to decline in the value of the currency in the country like many countries in the world recently. On top of that, if any leader said there is lack in the rice in the country, so people will statrt to buy huge amount of this product which may cause a problem in the street, but if the leaders deal with this information without share it, then they can demonstrate and deal with it truly.
Second, political leaders have relationships with other leaders in other countries because they have beneficial relations with each others, so they have to deal with them in sensitive way, away from the social media and the press. For instance, if a political leader made a complaint or issue to his managers about any problem in another country it may solve, but if the public knew about it this may lead to huge political problems such as close the country boundries, terminate the contracts of the employees from the same country or war. However, the recent decades showed many examples about some types of these problems in the world.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that political leaders have a sensetive position in their country, so they have to be claim and do not share every information to the public to stop any expected problems inside or outside the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'responsibility'?
Suggestion: responsibility
...s my firm belief people how have a high responsibilities in their country know valuable informat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...now valuable information which can make a fluctuate in the street, so they have to withhold...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ers know enormous number of information everyday about the country which includes politi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this acquaintance' or 'these acquaintances'?
Suggestion: this acquaintance; these acquaintances
...ing or the president of the country, so these acquaintance should not be publish to the public bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'presidents'' or 'president's'?
Suggestion: presidents'; president's
...sh to the public because it may put the presidents life to the hazard or risk. Moreover, e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in some cases, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79787234043 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63994350702 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478723404255 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.3289206148 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.0 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1818181818 23.4991977007 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 5.21951772744 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139682889381 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617950008153 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417126229454 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968658469361 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012676962927 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.