With advancement, technology has become an integral part of our lives. In today's world we cannot imagine an hour without technology. The topic that whether technology acts as barrier in human communication or it enhances the ways of interaction with people is a topic of debate among people from all walks of life. I believe that technology helps in making better communication among people from all over the world.
First and foremost, technology has made possible to communicate with people from different corners of the world. Social networking sites such as Facebook helps us to connect with people from different nations. This was not possible in the past thus, all thanks to technology making communication better. Technology has given new dimensions to communication. For example, online interviews are possible through video conference. This not only saves travelling time of the interviewee but also gives opportunity to apply in companies worldwide. Moreover, because of advancement in technology parents can talk to their children who stay abroad for education or due to other reasons. They are not able to do face to face interaction due to long distance but are able to see each other through video chats.
Besides this, in case of exigent situations technology helps to communicate. For example, if somebody met with an accident, then with the help of mobile phone ambulance can be called also person's family can be apprised on time. Moreover, an important message can be delivered to the person, who might be busy in some meeting and may not be in position to take phone calls. Thus, in such cases right message can be send to the right person within right time. So, advancement in technology is helping people to connect in better way as there are situations where face to face communication is not possible.
Last but not the least, there are devices which can detect a lie with voice modulation over phone. Thus, making the communication more reliable and effective. However, there are some issues related with technology. It is making people more inactive. For example, in office, a person prefers to send mail to colleagues regarding any information related to the project rather then going to teammate's desk. to talk verbally. But, this problem is not created by technology, the problem lies with us. We are the one not interacting with colleagues face to face because of our laziness.
To conclude, technology has helped us in many ways such as connecting with people all over the world, giving some vital information etc. There are certain problems with this development but they can be addressed by showing activeness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce. This not only saves travelling time of the interviewee but also gives opport...
^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'situations'' or 'situation's'?
Suggestion: situations'; situation's
...ts. Besides this, in case of exigent situations technology helps to communicate. For ex...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...formation related to the project rather then going to teammates desk. to talk verbal...
^^^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ct rather then going to teammates desk. to talk verbally. But, this problem is not...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10344827586 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80928946171 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1959307538 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2222222222 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315007228732 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864253683985 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705035586814 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188228465445 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615907391616 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.