The rapidly shifting world of technologies has drastically changed the way in which people behave in society. Technologies developed in the past several decades has fundamentally altered the socialization patterns and behaviors of this generation, in both positive and detrimental ways. Developments such as texting, Skype, and Facebook have made available myriad new ways of communicating and interacting with one's friends. However, these technologies also make it more difficult to be exposed to new people and viewpoints, and gain socialization behaviors necessary for healthy interaction with society at large.This paradoxially hinders human interaction and isolates those who depend on such technology.
The ability to interact and keep in touch with one's friends at any time and place seems like a great boon at first, but over-reliance on this network stagates one's social skills, and prevents people from fully immersing themselves with new people and surroundings. Texting, in particular, is often used as a social crutch in uncomfortable situations. It's a common ocurrance in a crowded elevator full of strangers to see everyone with their phones out, attempting to avoid each other's gazes. Even at restaurants, it's not uncommon to see couples texting their respective friends rather than engaging in conversation with each other. Technologies such as texting provide a social safety net available anywhere, at any time. However, the downside of this is that people don't learn how to deal with new social situations, and voluntarily restrict their own social contact.
Besides being a hinderance to forging new social connections, technology can in a way replace human contact altogether. Deep and dedicated friendships with plenty of face-to-face contact is eschewed in favor of hundreds and hundreds of barely-recognizable Facebook "friends", online gaming buddies who have never met in real life, and forums and web communities which provide comfortable places where the unpleasantries of real-life interaction, clashing interests, and dissenting opinions don't have to be dealt with. It is far too easy to become lost in a virtual world, to the detriment of existing in the actual world. This sort of behavior exists all around the world, from stay-at-home all-night gamers in America to 30-something "otaku" hermits in Japan, to die-hard Internet cafe residents in China. The social problems caused by technology infatuation are so severe that several countries, including India, South Korea, and Russia, have passed laws attempting to curb such behavior.
Technology is a wonderful thing, and provides new and _ methods of human interaction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s of communicating and interacting with ones friends. However, these technologies al...
^^^^
Line 1, column 615, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...althy interaction with society at large.This paradoxially hinders human interaction ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 48, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...lity to interact and keep in touch with ones friends at any time and place seems lik...
^^^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ial crutch in uncomfortable situations. Its a common ocurrance in a crowded elevato...
^^^
Line 2, column 767, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...er, the downside of this is that people dont learn how to deal with new social situa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hing interests, and dissenting opinions dont have to be dealt with. It is far too ea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, in particular, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61481481481 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28021489392 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612345679012 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.2013026918 60.3974514979 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.125 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3125 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244870358494 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855950294545 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588863743747 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172785749234 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508069312514 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.38706741573 122% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.