Education is a broad term which comprises honing minds, providing knowledge in different fields, increasing competence through comprehension, developing latent talents, and improving abstract learning. Students should be assessed not just by their ability to grasp various facts by rote learning but understanding and applying the knowledge and cultivating habits of reasoning and logic which can make pupils more proficient in their respective fields.
When we learn we try to understand and then rehearse so that we could memorize it. But when we simply memorize by cramming then it is most likey that whatever facts learnt will be forgotten even though we score well in the examination. Our education system should not evaluate students performance just on the basis of annual examinations but on regular tests and other activites so that overall intelligence and hard work of the child could be assessed objectively and deserving students get reinforced to do well next time.
Disciples are taught different subjects like social studies, science, mathematics. But very few teachers instigate a habit of reasoning and critical thinking and teaching of how they are appliable in different situations. For example in the class of Moral science, students are taught about things like honesty, following traffic rules and effects of drugs and smoking, peer pressure, punctuality and others. But if the teacher is not following the rules then children will not apply these to their lives but cram for their exam. Students or children do what they see not what they hear. This is a reason why so many parents complain that we never taught our child to lie but he/she is lying; it shows that the child is doing what is around him/her.
Schools and colleges should have in their system to give more credit to students who are active in various activities, punctual to the class, and are disciplined. So that the task of education should not be merely to teach text book material and score high in examinations but to make them better individuals. Pupils should have the feat to argue or debate the topic discussed in the class, more appreciation should be given to the volunteers or other participants. In this way teachers can evaluate who was more attentive in the class.
There are so many areas and fields in science and mathematics where theoretical explanations are given. Though they are not ecumenical, they are applicable in many ways. While teaching such subjects students should be invigorated to question the aspects which they think are not correct or when some dilemma occur in their young minds and they could clear it,this will also help other students in the class to be able to absorb the topic well and clear the facts.
Theoretical as well as practial training in different subject should be fortified so that everyv chid could learn by doing and could visualise the material and store in the long term memory.
Educators should make sure that their evaluation and assessment of the student is of overall performance and not on the basis of single examination. Their minds should be sharpened by implementing practical knowledge and enhancing their comprehension and competence in their respective fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 359, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
...heir young minds and they could clear it,this will also help other students in the cl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 38.0 14.8657303371 256% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2714.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 526.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15969581749 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74671671587 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488593155894 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 808.2 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5743160826 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.238095238 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0476190476 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90476190476 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184637739574 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542422920211 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585576994823 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098691821629 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057256265503 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.