Many may argue that teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. But what if we flipped the coin, by suggesting that accomplish a better students' academic performance by elevating teachers' salaries?. In my opinion, teachers salaries should not be affected by students academic performance.
First, it is pervasive to assume that the performance of students in the class is a scale for the knowledge that they have retained. Students may learn valuable information and nurture their abilities in the class, but this can not be measured by their test results. Also, students may vary in their tendency to learn, learning abilities, and interests in the subject. So, the performance of students in the class is not a reflection of the teacher's teaching methods and devotion to teaching. For example, students grades in the same subject, taught by the same teacher, defer from year to year, and from student to student.
Moreover, appraising the students' performance in the class as a holistic measure to the teacher salary may corrupt the educational process. For instance, some teachers may be persuaded to boost the students' achievements by giving them easy tests or by giving them grades which they do not deserve. Thus, it is deleterious to subject the teaching profession to the influence of money, it is a novel profession, which has a vital role in shaping the future generations and greatness of the nation.
On the other hand, many countries tend to increase teachers salaries to promote their performance and spark their creativity of teaching. Teachers should have a welfare of life to be efficient and more productive, which, accordingly, will escalate the academic performance of the students and enhance their learning experience. In contrast, if the teachers' income is limited, the teachers will be lax and retain teaching as a transitory job, which will deteriorate the students learning experience.
In conclusion, the teaching profession is critical and vital in the community. Teachers salaries should not be subjected to students achievements.
Essay Categories:
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
Many may argue that teachers salaries should be ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...to student. Moreover, appraising the students performance in the class as a holistic ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...earning experience. In contrast, if the teachers income is limited, the teachers will be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 488, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
... will deteriorate the students learning experience. In conclusion, the teaching profess...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 334.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35928143713 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97899828452 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476047904192 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0261010976 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.875 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 5.21951772744 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411735604517 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16569804774 0.0831039109588 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154187971907 0.0758088955206 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273297874094 0.150359130593 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145312875827 0.0667264976115 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.