Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be

while people are so busy with People nowadays are so busy with the fast pace of life, so they tend to ignore any problem until it hit them in their faces. Scandals can act as a wake-up call for profound change and raise people attention on a specific problem more than speakers or reformers, but scandals have a negative impact as well.

Scandals are most common in politics, where are power and money exist. Mostly, the politicians use scandals as a tool to discredit their opponents. we all remember the scandal of the former president Bill Clinton, the other political party used this scandal to damage Clinton reputation and discriminate him. Furthermore, years later, when Hillary Clinton ran for the presidential election recently, her opponent used the same scandal against her along with other scandals. Scandals in politics are powerful. People could choose who to elect according to these kinds of information.

While media should help to raise people awareness and focus their attention on problems, media instinctively hunt for the scandals to make stunning headlines and raise their popularity. Most of the time scandals are pompous and fallacious and can destroy innocent people lives. Especially with the pervasive use of social media as a source for news, anyone can create a fake news and create a scandal to ruin the reputation of individual or institution.

Scandals can raise people awareness by spotting the consequences of the wrong-doing, most importantly, if scandals involve people whom they consider a role model. In addition to damaging the reputation of the wrong-doer, also it affects other sides of his life such as; health, family or social life. For instance, Maradona, who is considered for many people as the greatest soccer player of all the time, was addicted to drugs (cocaine), this shocking news for his fans around the world soon affected his career, years later he was unable to play soccer anymore as a result. undoubtedly, this kind of scandal touched the lives of many of his fans and thought about the deteriorating effects of drugs.
in conclusion, while Scandals focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could, some scandals affect the lives of people but others are fallacious and aim to ruin the reputation of individuals or instituation.own

Votes
Average: 6.8 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
while people are so busy with People nowadays...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...as a tool to discredit their opponents. we all remember the scandal of the former ...
^^
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'drug'.
Suggestion: drug
...player of all the time, was addicted to drugs cocaine, this shocking news for his fan...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 575, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Undoubtedly
...ble to play soccer anymore as a result. undoubtedly, this kind of scandal touched the lives...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...t the deteriorating effects of drugs. in conclusion, while Scandals focus our at...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10209424084 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75403743332 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552356020942 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0173551818 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8125 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154091122755 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567423834872 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053705205813 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110065763693 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715578147666 0.0667264976115 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.