As the famous saying,” the failure is the mother of success” the prompt says those people who do not listen to the others’ opinion are likely leaving a long-standing legacy. I strongly disagree, as the more one closes on his mindset and does not listen to the others’ perspectives, the more be isolated and does not evolve for two essential reasons.
Firstly, one does not necessarily listen to who make destructive criticism, instead listen to constructive criticism as it helps one to see himself. For example, if there is a CEO of one of the current companies and wants to sell a new product to a new market. If he failed to sell that product and achieve profits cover costs, then does not willing to listen or care about the others’ critiques towards what he mistakenly did. In the future, he will repeat that mistake; and consequently, the business’ owner will not be keen on keeping him longer. This example illustrates how the others’ standpoints, and their doubts towards our demeanors or even beliefs, act as a mirror. Therefore, one should listen and care about what is being told for him to be able to evolve as well as be successful.
Secondly, listening to others’ views also helps one to sustain his position more. For example, in 2012, in Egypt, Egyptians ousted their president after only one year from his taking over for the residency. This ousted president was obstinate and did not listen for the country’s political-pundits to inspect himself; whether he was doing well. Thus, the ramifications were not benign, led him to be driven away from his position. This example elaborates how who are uncompromising and immutable to listen to criticism; inevitable would face disasters in their life. Life does not have those who are infallible, so to be able veritable to leave a permanent respected heritage should listen and acquire from the others’ opinions as well as their experience.
In conclusion, criticism is an essential key in the success, especially constructive one; thus, the more one becomes concerning by the others’ points of view, the more saves himself and puts himself on the right way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
As the famous saying,” the failure is the mother of success” t...
^
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...g,” the failure is the mother of success” the prompt says those people who do not...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not evolve for two essential reasons. Firstly, one does not necessarily listen...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le to evolve as well as be successful. Secondly, listening to others’ views als...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... opinions as well as their experience. In conclusion, criticism is an essential...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00278551532 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88716748156 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532033426184 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1814768698 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.733333333 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.21951772744 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125745432569 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477527682199 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395504169408 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832113955381 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119178737773 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.