Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.
The statement is comprehensive and conveys the meaning explicitly. It says that the students pursuing Business or Science as their major should not be required to study subjects of Humanities as it will not benefit them in their future careers. I strongly agree with the statement is it is apt in its meaning. Studying science or business is not a walk in the park for anyone rather, it requires extensive research and focused study to comprehend the theories and its practical applications. It would be absolutely an encumbrance for the students of science or business studies to take up the extra pressure of studying humanities.
Further, students of science and business are morphed in a specific way which makes them more equipped at learning concepts and its applications. Humanities undoubtedly require a disparate approach of studying which the students of science and business are not accustomed to. In the current world of technology, students are already burdened with a myriad of courses of their specifications and making them study humanities courses would further their ordeal.
Albeit, some courses of humanities might be advantageous to the people of other majors as worldly knowledge is vital to some extent as well. But, in most cases, this would result in extra pressure being added to the students of science or business. People might argue that to thrive, one must know every aspect of the world, not just the core of their specification. This holds to an extent as the history of how things changed or the laws of the country a person is living in are important for the well-being of a civilian. However, this can be accounted for by motivating and encouraging the students of science and business to develop a habit of reading newspapers and learn about history and geography briefly. Most companies in this era conduct a general knowledge round of test or question the candidates regarding various worldly matters as a part of the selection process. This, in turn, made most of the students of science and business aware and engage in learning subjects apart from their courses.
Students of science and business should hence be motivated to study subjects apart from their courses in their free time rather than forcing them to study the subjects of humanities as a part of the curriculum which will eventually put extra pressure on the students. In a nutshell, the students majoring in science and business should not be burdened to study humanities as a part of their curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-12 | Sheikh Munim | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Loolu | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Loolu | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Loolu | 75 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Md. Mahafuzur Rahaman | 66 | view |
- "In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through the major downtown areas, a part of the town where buses serve as the only 52
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 33
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 58
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific way" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nts of science and business are morphed in a specific way which makes them more equipped at learn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, hence, however, if, regarding, so, well, apart from, of course, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05755395683 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81013002134 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453237410072 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5604492303 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.058823529 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363237227148 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127349728427 0.0831039109588 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113103085366 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243334611978 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472332970106 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.