The course curriculum of undergraduate students should be well developed on the basis of the future carrier. The students of Business or Science will need to learn more on their perspective subjects for building a successful carrier. Any irrelevant courses such as humanities will not help them in their carrier to flourish. So, It is not necessary for the students of business or Science to take any Humanities courses in their undergraduate education.
Avoiding the humanity course by an undergraduate student who is in major with Science and Business, will save his money and time. A student should take his course focusing on his future carrier. For example, if he takes humanity courses, it will have no effect on his jobs in the future. On the other hand, it will waste his valuable time which he can use on performing experimental works as well as increasing his practical skills. In the same way, the student has to pay an extra amount of money to his institution for the courses that may be a burden financially for him.
The time, the student can save in his undergraduate life by avoiding the humanity courses, can be used in increasing their skills and ability to cope with the challenging job market. The student can work as a part-time worker at that time which will not only help them to augment their ability but also provide them a strong sense with the practical environment and the person with whom they have to work in the future.
In the contrary, one may think that a humanity course in undergraduate life may help a student to develop their communication skill. But, these communication skills that can be developed are completely theoretical. Working during student life will help them to obtain practical knowledge in communication.
Thus, students should be focused only on their respective branch, such as Science or humanity for saving their time and money as well as developing their practical knowledge and communication skills in their undergraduate life
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, well, as to, for example, such as, as well as, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 333.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97597597598 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.880623489 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432432432432 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5686684557 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347354366348 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156417842356 0.0831039109588 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114735295212 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220985041708 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118099752332 0.0667264976115 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.