While it would seem very harmonious to conclude that ancient human knew something about our physiology as their eating diet-Paleo diets- prevented them from many chronic diseases, there was a lot of deficiency of evidence to conclude this claim. We need the following information discussed below to confirm or refute the argument.
In the era of science and technology, any anecdote or placate of a claim would not be acceptable until you could prove the claim through testing. To examine about the benignity or harmfulness about the Paleo diets, we need to conduct a study. Suppose, a study consisting with 1000 people of different ages on the effect of Paleo diets who consume the diet for one year and strictly follow the diets. In calculating the results, the age of the people who take part in the study is very important. The people within age below 50 years usually do not face any difficulties with their knees or brain functioning. Let's consider, the number of people whose age are above 50 years and take part in the study is 200. Among them if no one would not face any knee or brain related problems, we still could not conclude that the Paleo diets are good or bad. Because, the duration of study is only one year which may very negligible in comparison to the functioning time of Paleo diets.
There might be another reasons behind the eating of Paleo diets by the ancient people. Perhaps, they did not know the recipe of other diets or they did not have any information about the ingredients needed to produce penchant diets. Thus, they might ate these Paleo diets only to live their life.
Above all, The ancient people could take the paleo diet since they would not any way of producing tasty diets. Also to justify about the diets effectiveness in human body, a details study in necessary.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 316 350
No. of Characters: 1462 1500
No. of Different Words: 167 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.216 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.627 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.365 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 78 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.067 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.826 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.366 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.366 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.134 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun deficiency seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of deficiencies'.
Suggestion: a lot of deficiencies
...m from many chronic diseases, there was a lot of deficiency of evidence to conclude this claim. We ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... with their knees or brain functioning. Lets consider, the number of people whose ag...
^^^^
Line 2, column 847, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e that the Paleo diets are good or bad. Because, the duration of study is only one year...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d not any way of producing tasty diets. Also to justify about the diets effectivenes...
^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'diets'' or 'diet's'?
Suggestion: diets'; diet's
... tasty diets. Also to justify about the diets effectiveness in human body, a details ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 55.5748502994 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 316.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73101265823 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43964766067 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528481012658 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3551125079 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46666666667 5.70786347227 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158853335274 0.218282227539 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057018174965 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438440104144 0.0701772020484 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111184856674 0.128457276422 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359450500519 0.0628817314937 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 98.500998004 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.