Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
<span style="color: rgb(75, 80, 78); font-family: Menlo, Monaco, Consolas, "Courier New", monospace; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre-line; background-color: rgb(247, 247, 249);">Paleo diet is largely supporting the eating habits of hominids. The argument fails to explain numerous statements.
the lack of evidence that shows the use of animal bone broth or a soup made by cooking animal bones healing N number of people. The medical test results are important to prove any scientifica theory is valid or not. Also, the argument does not explain which animal bone soup or broth would heal joints or brain related issues. It has generalized idea which fails to provide distinct medical solution that would help heal people.
The argument is assumes that a solution that worked for hominids will work for modern human being. It is possible that the solution that worked for hominids will not work for current genration of people. The argument should provide scintific evidence that the medical solution that worked for homids will also work fot homo sapiens or modern day human being. Modern day human being might have some habits which diiferent from hominids which will nullify the effect of cure. For example use of antibiotics or flu shots present in the modern human being would not make cure effective.
The assumption of curing many chronical illness could be dangerous. As it does not provide the time to heal the joints or chondroitin, it might take a life long time to cure with this process. In that case the cure won't any helpful if the effectiveness is very low and the process of preparation is time consuming. This will be dangerous for patient who kept all hopes on this solution to work and see no or minute results over decades. It might even more severe if it is relating to brain issues, where patient is hoping to cure damaged nerves with this unproven method. The argument could be bolstered by providing the scientific data that shows this method worked for certain number of people over certain time period.
The argument lacks in with sufficient scientific data or study that proves the Paleo diet would work, the time of healing patients or the effectiveness of the cure on current genration of human being. Hence fails to show to prove the point.</span><br>
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 386 350
No. of Characters: 1856 1500
No. of Different Words: 188 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.432 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.808 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.396 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.316 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.936 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.316 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.31 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.548 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...o explain numerous statements. the lack of evidence that shows the use of ...
^^^
Line 15, column 403, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... hopes on this solution to work and see no or minute results over decades. It migh...
^^
Line 19, column 202, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...re on current genration of human being. Hence fails to show to prove the point.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 55.5748502994 65% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 2260.96107784 86% => OK
No of words: 379.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13192612137 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75834269275 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501319261214 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6057213908 57.8364921388 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.368421053 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.68421052632 5.70786347227 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13596227608 0.218282227539 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454153990987 0.0743258471296 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590934008552 0.0701772020484 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730150400886 0.128457276422 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606678820251 0.0628817314937 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.