The passage presents the argument that Paleo diets are causation of curing chronic diseases. The argument lacks concrete evidence and is subjected to fallacy. Moreover, the opposing views also rely on anecdotal evidence rather than on any scientific evidence.
The argument states that the proponents claim that paleo diets are having health-promoting nutrients such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. But this study is not based on any scientific study. No research has been carried out to perform the experiment on such people who are consuming this type of diet. There is no statistical data to support this claim. The argument itself states that it is based on anecdotal evidence.
Moreover, the opposing views also rely on anecdotal data which can be used to impugn the claim bolstered by the proponents. It also lacks concrete evidence and scientific data to support that paleo diets are not having health-promoting nutrients.
Additionally, our human ancestors used to live in a wild forest where pollution was never a concern. Our lifestyle is too much different from that of our ancestors. Today, we live in a polluted environment where everything we eat is adulterated.
To compare, today's people's metabolism to that of proponents and saying that bone broth diets will help us to cure much chronic illness is an absurd statement.
Moreover, no valid scientific study has been carried out on people who are eating those diets and those who are not.
No scientific number has been stated. Everything is based on mere numbers. No, any the causation factor has been explained that paleo diets can cure chronic ailments. Therefore, there is a fallacy in this argument and subjected to fallacy.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Characters: 1439 1500
No. of Different Words: 138 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.105 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.067 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.749 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 99 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.947 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.143 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.368 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.471 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.075 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s argument and subjected to fallacy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 55.5748502994 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 284.0 441.139720559 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85643690623 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 204.123752495 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489436619718 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1972284432 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4736842105 119.503703932 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9473684211 23.324526521 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47368421053 5.70786347227 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144692742949 0.218282227539 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392853137126 0.0743258471296 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03632991674 0.0701772020484 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682455334604 0.128457276422 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029568446423 0.0628817314937 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.3550499002 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.197005988 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.