Leaders are those who govern a group of people to attain a specific task or goal. They should have the essential qualities of leading the group. They give direction to each member so that the allotted task to each can be done in a proper manner which would conducive to being the group successful. Sometimes, they demand feedback from the team members for the decisions he/she is taking for the entire team. It is not always necessary that it is the quality of the best leader always. I disagree with this statement.
The quality of taking feedback on the decision from team members sometimes implies that the leader is not confident of his/her decision. The leader might be skeptical of his decisions about the team. It may indicate that he/she is unsure about the results of the decision or action taken instead of doing good to the team. To illustrate, If some leader always does a poll of the decision/idea whether it should be implemented or not, he/she is dependent on others for checking the validity of the decisions. He/She is not having an independent thought process, thereby if any emergency comes he/she remains in the flux of his opinions or ideas. It implies that a leader can not be the best leader in this case. Thus, I reject this statement.
Sometimes, the leader takes feedback from the people they lead to get satisfaction about whether they contend with his/her decision being taken. It will boost the morale of the leader if all give good feedback. It will let the leader get familiar with the different problems being faced by the people whom the leader governs. Thus, the leader can get a chance to know about the loopholes in his/her governance. He/she can then correct the governance if loopholes are present. If the leadership would be good, it will make people or team members happy. The leader would be more respected in that case. Such a leader would be leveraged with the title of best leader.
As we see if the leader encourages the people for their feedback or seeks the validity of his/her decision, it may not always be the characteristic of the good leader or the best leader. Therefore, I reject this claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t the allotted task to each can be done in a proper manner which would conducive to being the grou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 478, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...at it is the quality of the best leader always. I disagree with this statement. The...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...eader would be leveraged with the title of best leader. As we see if the leader encour...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eader. Therefore, I reject this claim.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, then, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.752 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50890113175 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437333333333 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6752736589 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4782608696 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3043478261 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.47826086957 5.21951772744 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334048542299 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984690186926 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896354822815 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224957627638 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682233090642 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.