TPO 66 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Although focusing on one skill seems simpler and captivating since it comes with a sense of deepening the knowledge and
enhancing efficiency in one single skill, modern advanced world works on a more complex and competitive system. Since
efficiency in multifaceted sectors is a must in this advanced age, i strongly believe that people who develop many different
skills are more successful than who focus on one skill only.
Surviving in an advanced world entails complex problems that require sustainable solution which can vary place to place, time
to time. Coping with such dilemma, we need to be skilled with excellence so that we can face every possible secenario. We
cannot rely on one skill only to be ensured that we would be able to handle these complex problems. For instance let us think
about the problem of global warming. Understanding and solving this massive potential problem for the whole earth, there is a
certain level of understanding and skill required concerning different sectors such as: geography, geology, environmental
science, chemical science etc. If a person only focuses on a single skill, he would not be able to contribute in the problem
solving process.
Businesses of local area have not been confined in local area range only. Every steps in the economic and environmental fields
has become global now. Since everybody and everything is connected with each other, different skills intertwined with each
other are necessary for remaining in the competition. This competition itself has created a huge difference the way we look into
skills now. As people are upgrading their skills in mutiple sectors, others need to keep pace with them in order to survive.
Success chance increases highly when a person or company has mastery over higher range of different skills.
One simple example can clarify the whole argument. Let us think about a job for which numerous number of candidates have
applied. They have the same educational background and positive impact on the interview board. Now whom does the hiring
company choose? The answer is manifest as sunlight in a bright day, the one with most skills and experience. Hence, skills
significantly weigh on one's efficiency.
Moreover, the modern world conditions do not leave us with the option of having one single skill rather than a multi-purpose.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...trongly believe that people who develop many different skills are more successful than who fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23684210526 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73063567528 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8837667342 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7619047619 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0952380952 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.53405017921 441% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30037647419 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806536222157 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887920036159 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937897749002 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092449262483 0.0645574589148 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.