The article and the lecture are discussed about the airships. The passage tells about the advantages for the potential use of
airships in future. However, the lecture refutes the claims of the passage by providing supporting evidencial documents for
which the airships can not be used in future. According to the professor, the airships are less acceptable to be used in future for
three different reasons. The reasons are stated below.
First of all, although airships need less amount of fuel in compare to other vehicles like airplanes or helicopters, the fuel used in
airships should be lighter than the air. The only available fuel suitable for airships for this purpose is hydrogen or hellium. The
lecture mentions that the use of hydrogen would be very dangerous as it may ignite fire easily. He referred the previous airships
burning accidents to show about how dangerous the use of hydrogen could be. On the other hand the hellium is costly and are
not easy to extract it. As hellium has these limitations and are not able to produce high lifting, it would not be as effective as
today's airplanes. As a result, these statement of the lecture refutes the idea that the use of airships would be economical.
Secondly, The lecture depicts that the lifting of loads by airships would face a lot of challenges. The smoth landing in between
the forest is necessary to pick up the tree log which would be very difficult as the winds could move the huge ballons of
airships. This proves that the concepts of conveying heavy loads by airships are vague and incorrect.
Finally, The lecture states that the airships can move vertically only 14 km away from the surface where the aiships have to
work against strong winds. This could use a lot of fuel to keep the airships stationary and it would not be possible to make and
uninterrupted service by the airships, as refuelling of airships would necessary- that the satellite can provide us. In contrary, the
refuelling process would augment the financial cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ages for the potential use of airships in future. However, the lecture refutes the claim...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...for which the airships can not be used in future. According to the professor, the airshi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 32, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this statement' or 'these statements'?
Suggestion: this statement; these statements
...tive as todays airplanes. As a result, these statement of the lecture refutes the idea that th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 343.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94460641399 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58128321966 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492711370262 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8634416319 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 17.0 4.09492273731 415% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183801177937 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060900396268 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513958985904 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627684233295 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475945493619 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.