The professor provides some strong argument to make communal online encyclopedias more valuable in comparison to
traditional, printed encyclopedias and hence solve some problems that are illustrated within the article. The arguments used in
the lecture are given below.
Firstly, both communal online encyclopedias and traditional encyclopedias are not free from error. Although academic people
writes the printed encyclopedias, error or mistakes may occur there. This mistake can sustain for a long time as correction of
these mistake is very cumbersome and incorrigible for this encylopedias. On the other hand, the mistake can be easily corrected
in online encylopedias.
The articles of communal online encyclopedias can not be changed if the writes upload the article in read only mode. In some
cases, hackers or vandals may change the content of the article. Special editor of the online encyclopedias can detect the change
and make correction of it. This refutes what is stated in the passage about the fabrication, delete or corrupt information in this
encyclopedias.
One of the major problem in print encyclopedias is the shortage of space which is not a problem for the online encyclopedias.
Besides, variety and diversity can be obtained in communal online encyclopedia
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 127, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ation, delete or corrupt information in this encyclopedias. One of the major probl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58080808081 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18390584069 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.55342163355 122% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8801602247 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0833333333 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 4.09492273731 293% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3369953711 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132838507944 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115041252531 0.0662205650399 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137811817342 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969792634223 0.0443174109184 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 53.8541721854 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.