Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study

Essay topics:

Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.

Now a day’s people tend to be more flexible when it comes to selecting the career. While studying in the colleges or university, students are primarily focusing on the optional subjects within their courses. This is because the students are more or less inclined towards the matter of subjects which they like the most. The prompts suggest the same scenario presented in the above sentence. I mostly agree with the authors assertion for two main reasons. However, i do concede that deviating from the path of the study by choosing another field of study would give rise to the burden to the students.
First of all, students are tempting more toward the field of study that is something other than the courses they are currently studying in their colleges or school. This is because, for the whole semester if someone is giving more attention toward the primary core subjects then it would definitely be going to create some sort of pressure to the students. If the students are given other optional subject which is not directly related to their field then, it will create opportunity for them to study the other side of the study. And if the optional subject is related to their filed of interest, for example, if the fellow students is a huge fan of soccer and if he is facilitated with the subject (optional) related to the content of soccer, then there might be the chances for him/her to give keen focus toward their study.
Second of all, if students are allowed to choose the course that are not the part of their primary education, then it will create opportunity for the fellow students to do something that is very appreciable for future. For instance, the students might get bore out of their study while attending full of lectures related to their field. And there might be the scenario that, the students might not get interest toward the study thinking of the same repetitive and boring lectures through-out the day. Provided with the optional courses, if the students are being taught with so, with the alternate period through the teaching period then, it will give some sort of relief to the students. They might not think of the same and dull lecture which might come across their way.
However, providing with the extra-curricular activities or the field of study might diverge the thinking of the fellow students, toward the hedonism. Students might think of the field of their interest and give no attention towards their primary study, which might therefore become a burden for their study. It will be difficult for the students to grasp the core of their education knowledge, which will bring about the falling graph for their study. But giving focus toward each field of the student's study, would encourage them to become whatever they want to become in their life.
So, in conclusion, there are more of the positive side for the students if they are allowed to choose some other field of study. It will make them creative, and wise enough to choose their path and to make decision for their future.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...above sentence. I mostly agree with the authors assertion for two main reasons. However...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 465, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ssertion for two main reasons. However, i do concede that deviating from the path...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, first of all, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2510.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81765834933 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36815029886 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.389635316699 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 771.3 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2542189814 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.523809524 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8095238095 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187354622704 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777972560035 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628516375679 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130195003295 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306949042417 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.