Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the lecture are about the modification of office work duration. The reading is of the point that company could get more benefit by reducing the work days per week for the employee. While the lecturer doesn't support this idea for three main reasons which I will elucidate below.
First of all, the author of the reading feels that decreasing the workweek would increase company revenue to the higher as it would alleviate the stress from the employee. He additionally holds the idea that company would rather increase the staff to ensure the compensation of work. However, the man in the conversation doesn't support this idea. He is of the point that, company acquiring more staff would be quite detrimental because it requires the firm to spend some extra money on furniture and computers. In addition to this, he also argues that more staff means to spend more on training programs and also extra amount of medical benefits would be required to ensure the safety of their personnel.
Secondly, the reading passage argues that employee would feel much better having the four days work week. On top of that he also feels that this would be quite beneficial in terms of decreasing the unemployment as company can hire more staff and pay only 80 percent of the normal rate. But, the lecturer doesn't support this idea. He thinks that, although there are some staff who would love to be paid at lower price but there are some other employee who doesn't choose to work 4 day per week. He also points that, company might ask their employee to work overtime to ramify their work to ensure stability at their organization.
Lastly, the author of reading passage feels that most of the employee would choose to spend more of the leisure time with their family and devote their holiday for the leisure activities. However, the lecturer contends this idea. He feels that, spending more of the time for personal activities would be risky and it may also reduce the quality of life. He additionally says that during the time of crisis company might be asking their staff to quit their job especially for those who are working 4 days workweek, which would be quite detrimental for the progress and advancement of their career. And also, company might prefer to choose the personnel for the management post who can give the best of their time towards work which in case of 4 days working staff would not be possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ek for the employee. While the lecturer doesnt support this idea for three main reason...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... increase company revenue to the higher as it would alleviate the stress from the ...
^^
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...k. However, the man in the conversation doesnt support this idea. He is of the point t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t of the normal rate. But, the lecturer doesnt support this idea. He thinks that, alth...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'staffs', 'staves'?
Suggestion: staffs; staves
...He thinks that, although there are some staff who would love to be paid at lower pric...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'employees'?
Suggestion: employees
...at lower price but there are some other employee who doesnt choose to work 4 day per wee...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e but there are some other employee who doesnt choose to work 4 day per week. He also ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 5.04856512141 396% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1373.03311258 146% => OK
No of words: 420.0 270.72406181 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77142857143 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34684619752 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438095238095 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 419.366225166 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6473543123 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972218927322 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425668213462 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270728901518 0.0662205650399 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772274705425 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243058997992 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.