Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about the possibility of establishing a human station on Venus. The author of the article feels that it is impossible to maintain a permanent human presence on Venus. However, the lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that it is challenging but possible for humans to live on Venus by floating their station high in the atmosphere rather than on Venus' surface.
According to the article, the atmospheric pressure on Venus' surface is so high that humans would be crushed. The lecturer points out that atmospheric pressure is much lower at 50 kilometers than the surface, and there would be no danger to humans of getting crushed at that height.
Secondly, the author claims that Venus' atmosphere hardly contains oxygen and water vapor, and they should be supplied from the earth, which is impractical. However, the lecturer asserts that water vapor and oxygen can be obtained from compounds existing in Venus' atmosphere using chemical processes.
Finally, the author posits that most solar radiation that reaches Venus' surface is reflected by the thick clouds, and a small portion reaches the surface. In this way, humans could not get electricity to power their station. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that the station at high altitude could benefit both sunlight received from the sun and reflected by thick clouds, so humans can have enough energy to power their floated station.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...o power their station. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that the station at high alti...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, second, secondly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55743984335 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8033351769 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.272727273 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102390892568 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472170587658 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502515473933 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063790231056 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304927251668 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.