To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Study of any society is a major task for anyone to achieve, if they are not the part of that society. The prompt is also mentioning about the same idea that is given in the above sentence. However, I mostly disagree with this position for two main reasons. But I do concede that, to have a better understanding of any society, one must have to give attention to every possible scenario.
First of all, character of any society is defined by how the locality of that particular area is behaving. One must look after each and every minute details, like how the people of that society is behaving within themselves. For example, let’s talk about Indian culture. If we have to study the culture of the society located to the southern part of India, then we must visit that particular place or a society rather than roaming here and there at the northern part of the country. Each and every society that belongs to a country may have different characteristics which might not be complementary with another culture.
Furthermore, for having better knowledge about the characteristics of any society, one must focus on its culture and rituals instead of focusing on any other irrelevant sources. The understanding of the society is solely based on the character of the people belonging to the society. Understanding about the major rituals and visiting to the sacred place would give better idea about how the character of society is. For instance, people in India celebrate the major festival called "dushehera", where they worship the lord Rama and during the same period the people in their society burns the prototype of the evil called Ravana. But it is just done reversely in the country Srilanka, where the people worship Ravana and they thought evil to be Lord Ram. It's just about the culture, how they are differing within the society.
However, to have better understanding about the characteristics of a society, one must have to give major attention to each and every other possibility where they can grab the knowledge. One must have better idea about how those culture is differing within the country or not. For the sake of better knowledge of the culture, one must visit each and every cities of a country to have sound knowledge of the characteristics of a society.
To conclude, for the better understanding of the characteristics of a society, one should give focus on every possible outcome rather than relying on just less sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-23 | Oladelejnrr | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | Mallika Asthana | 50 | view |
- In the past eating avocados was not considered to be necessarily beneficial Being unaware of their beneficial properties people used them mostly as avocado oil for different purposes It wasn t until recently that the advantages of consuming avocados were 73
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study 66
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless they in fact prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun sources is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ble outcome rather than relying on just less sources.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, then, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90647482014 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84806081537 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402877697842 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6646875336 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.684210526 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9473684211 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292742130434 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934097007098 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556779796843 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173036017828 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313228830675 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.