Study plays vital roles in students’ universities life, someone emphasizes the importance of a broad range of course, and including those courses that outside the field of students’ majors. However, although it is beneficial for students to take a broad of courses outside the field of study, it can also be a burden, distracting students from learning their core courses. Thus, the universities should suggest every student take a broad of courses instead of the requirement.
Someone would argue that students who take a broad range of courses, can be more competitive in the job interview, for the unrelated courses can enrich their knowledge and broaden their horizon. Indeed, by learning other courses closely related to their majors, they can consolidate their understanding of knowledge in their field. For example, by taking the polymer science courses, a student major in organic chemistry can have a deeper understanding of the chemical reaction and chemical application. However, this situation is only suitable for the intelligence students that have a lot of spare time to study another course, for those regular students, since they don’t have enough spare time, choosing another field of class can be a burden to them.
For the regular students, if they spend a lot of time to study the unrelated courses, they will not have enough time to focus on their core courses, let alone the poor students. Using the same organic chemistry major student as an example, if he/she spends a lot of time on computer science class, he/she may not have enough time to finish their task in their advanced organic chemistry class. To catch up with other students, they have to sacrifice their time for rest to memorize the organic reaction and memorize the mechanism of each reaction. Not only the sleep-deprivation way can cause a lower efficiency of study, but also they do not have enough time to understand the knowledge.
In my opinion, learning courses outside of one’s major can be a benefit for the top students who have a lot of spare time to study. But it can also be a catastrophe if it takes up too much time for these courses. Students should be encouraged to take a variety of courses outside the field of study instead of a requirement. For top students, they can consolidate their knowledge as well as broaden their horizon, through which can make them more competitive in the following job hunting. On the other hand, for the regular students and poorer students, focusing on the major courses is their best chance to keep up with the top students.
In conclusion, even if taking a variety of courses can be beneficial to some students, it cannot be a requirement for every student. University should suggest students take a variety of courses and give more guidance when they choose the courses that outside their field of study.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sur 66
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, of course, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2401.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01252609603 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77315620768 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.386221294363 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1460812229 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.388888889 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6111111111 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226599438467 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112412208764 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926451306673 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191057601138 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115239623822 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.