"The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, facts, data,or events and see different things."
The statement "The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, facts, data,or events and see different things" is certainly a controversial and complex statement. I partially agree and disagree with the statement. I provide my examples and evidence in support of my point of view in the following paragraphs.
When coming to India its academics includes only the aspects of educational capabilities and excludes all the other co-cultural activities.When coming to most happening and successful nations like Japan includes all the extra curricular activities in the academics along with the education, which promoted the growth and ability in children to build a creative and logical aspects. For any country in order to attain their utmost development they should follow the ideology of Japan.
In Consolidation of my point of View:
Why I agree with the statement?
Since the personality is a factor that builds up based upon our work, ability to grasp from the topic and perception level of individual. As the statement says that way in which students and scholars interpret the materials they work in their academics is absolutely a matter pf their personality than of training. This happens only when the individual is profound in that field of academics. By training he only gains the capability of executing particular task based but he can never be able to reach heights only on the based of training. When they attained an ability to build a personality, then can be capable of interpret the previous task, objects, facts and events in a different way. this ability of individual is appreciated.For example, normal b.tech graduate from the university of Madras named "Mr.Karthik",who is the designer of the great android application "makemytrip". His academics includes the subject Android development, he never treated it as normal subject just for sake of training rather he treated to interpret things differently. Which made him to reach heights.
Why i disagree with this topic?
When coming to developing a personality, one need to have keen interest and enthusiasm towards learning it. And our academics includes most of the topics which are completely failing to draw the attention of students. this made them to treat their academics just for sake of marks and this don't helping in building a personality to them.
Conclusion:
As i have provided irrefutable evidence in support of my point of view, I conclude my argument reiterating that the statement "The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, facts, data,or events and see different things" is partially acceptable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , or
...at exactly the same objects, facts, data,or events and see different things' i...
^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
...es all the other co-cultural activities.When coming to most happening and successful...
^^^^
Line 9, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e materials they work in their academics is absolutely a matter pf their personal...
^^
Line 9, column 676, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...revious task, objects, facts and events in a different way. this ability of individual is apprecia...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 696, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...s, facts and events in a different way. this ability of individual is appreciated.Fo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 738, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...is ability of individual is appreciated.For example, normal b.tech graduate from th...
^^^
Line 9, column 819, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karthik&apos
...the university of Madras named 'Mr.Karthik',who is the designer of the great andro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 832, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , who
...y of Madras named 'Mr.Karthik',who is the designer of the great android ap...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1081, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...reated to interpret things differently. Which made him to reach heights. Why i dis...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 5, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...Which made him to reach heights. Why i disagree with this topic? When comin...
^
Line 13, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ling to draw the attention of students. this made them to treat their academics just...
^^^^
Line 13, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ademics just for sake of marks and this dont helping in building a personality to th...
^^^^
Line 17, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , or
...at exactly the same objects, facts, data,or events and see different things' i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2595.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42887029289 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29142000783 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456066945607 0.4932671777 92% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 7.0 0.740449438202 945% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.5442367486 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7619047619 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.551120069801 0.243740707755 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155291828258 0.0831039109588 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184451945472 0.0758088955206 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239906888956 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.246918123117 0.0667264976115 370% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.