Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make. Does it have a positive or negative impact?
These days, thanks to development communication technology, many people from entire the world can interact with each other whenever they want. In other words, developing technology brings us new ways to communicate with each other easily and omitted distance limitations.
According to improvement communication technology, people can connect to the internet and enroll in several social websites like Facebook and twitter. These sites provide them with golden opportunity to make a friendship with people who are from different countries with a vast cultures variety. More over, thanks to invention smart phones and notebook, people would be able to see each other from far distance and talk together about any subject by lowest cost. These technologies help them to increase their relationships which would not be the case if they wanted to use the old ways to make a friendship. Furthermore, these technologies contribute to save money and time which are key factors to tackle economical problems.
In contrast, it is clear that using communication tools have positive impact on increasing the quantity of relationship while the quality of this kind of relationship is poor. These technologies induce people stay in front of their computers and notebooks for long time and do not enjoy from other kind of relationships. Little by little they tend to interact with their friends by these technologies and deprive themselves from face to face contacts and going out with their friends. Using these technologies encourage people to be isolate which will eventually lead to increasing psychological problems in the modern societies.
In conclusion, I think that although developing technology facilitate communications among people all over the world, several problems are appeared through using these technologies which make irreversible damages if people do not pay most attention to them. People should be used these tools for emergency circumstances and met their friends face to face.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-01-03 | Keerakiat | 75 | view |
2013-12-19 | Rudy | 50 | view |
2013-12-11 | sprigidts | 65 | view |
2013-11-23 | saeedriahi | 65 | view |
2013-08-16 | marjloveselmo | 75 | view |
- We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening the 86
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of facilities living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 66
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- Advertisement lead to high sales, agree or disagree 67
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities 75
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 5.511 7.5 (means your sentences are relatively the same length)
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 308 350
No. of Characters: 1655 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.189 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.373 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.95 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.692 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.511 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.462 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.364 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.581 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.148 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5