The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
Given are the charts providing clear information about the causes of worldwide land degradation and the effects of this process on certain regions for the period of 1990s.
A glance at the pie-chart reveals that the main reason of the damage of the land was considered over grazing made by cattle which indicates approximately 35 % and was marginally ahead of deforestation with the indicator of 30 %. Meanwhile, about two fifth of the world area became less productive due to over cultivation, followed by other activities which is 7 %.
Referring to the table it can also be noted that the majo...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-01-03 | Dhani Aristya | 63 | view |
| 2014-01-03 | cut muftia keumala | 73 | view |
| 2014-01-02 | naflaawfiyah | 60 | view |
| 2013-12-01 | orduhan | 73 | view |
| 2013-12-01 | qazzass | 40 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma 90
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. 75
- The chart below shows amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 70
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 75
- The diagram shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 203 200
No. of Characters: 997 1000
No. of Different Words: 118 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.775 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.911 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.941 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 53 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.329 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.452 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.78 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4