Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
In modern world the level of economic development of countries depends on many factors and it strongly differs from each other. As a result of this difference, countries can be classified as developed, developing and poorer countries.
Nowadays it is a subject of discussion if wealthy nations must share their wealth, such as food and education among poorer nations or if there is no need for this at all. A different view claims that looking after them is the responsibility of their own government.
In my opinion, the government of wealthy nations must help poorer countries and I can expl...
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 75
- This graph illustrates the number of Chinese, Korean and Indian students who enrolled at Rice University over a five year period. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- The tables below show the students per lecturer and the number of students in various practice and lecture based subjects 80
- Improvements in health, education andtrade are essential for the developmentof poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time You should write at least 250 words You shou 68
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Number of Paragraphs: 7 5
paragraphs are too short
better to have 5 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction. my choice: A or B. agree or disagree
para 2: reason 1
para 3: reason 2
para 4: reason 3 (optional)
para 5: conclusion
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 299 350
No. of Characters: 1476 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.158 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.936 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.767 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 85 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.182 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.962 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.431 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.795 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.198 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 7 5