The bar charts demonstrate the percent of people who had personal computers in different years and also the impact of the level of education on the computer ownership is revealed. Overall, with the passage of time, people had more passion for possessing computers.
The first chart illustrates an upward trend for the amount of the folks who had computers from 2002 to 2010. In detail, in 2002, lower than 60% of people held computers and after a steady rise, this figure reached to lower than 80%, in 2010.
Moving to the second chart, the level of education was entwined with computer ownership, inasmuch as the higher the level of education was, the more people had computers. To illustrate, postgraduates ranked high among other groups with 75% and 95% computer ownership in 2002 and 2010 respectively, and it was followed by the group who had bachelor and college students and some who had diploma. Also, people who had no diploma ranked low with 15% and 40% computer ownership in 2002 and 2010 respectively.
To sum up, people's enthusiasm towards computers was fired over time and also education had something to do with computer ownership.
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 81
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 10
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 70
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant. 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 193 200
No. of Characters: 925 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.727 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.793 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.587 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 47 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.008 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.498 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.748 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.157 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4