5. The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table depicts the comparison of the monthly household salary of France, Germany, UK, Turkey and Spain on various activities.
Overall, Turkey spends more for Food and Drink, UK for Housing, Germany for clothing and entertainment. The people of France and Spain does not stand at the top for any particular field. In all the countries the major share is for the food and drink, and they are least bothered clothing.
In food and drink sector the maximum share holders are the humans in Turkey with 36 percent. They give minor value to housing in contrast to food and drink as there is a fall of 16%. Spain occupies the next top contributor in the area of food and drink. The native people of that region give least respect to clothing as they provide only 8% to it. UK spends a bunch of money in housing, which is the greatest peak that has not been produced by anyone in comparison with all the sectors. They provide equal importance to both clothing and entertainment.
France also gives more importance to housing which hold a share of 31%, they do not care on clothing as their value for them is given by 7%. They are also at a good value for food and drink. Germans are more curious with 33%. They give little respect to clothing and entertainment by 15% and 19% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'give the least'.
Suggestion: give the least
...drink. The native people of that region give least respect to clothing as they provide onl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce to both clothing and entertainment. France also gives more importance to hou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61904761905 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46110654131 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8919824074 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.2142857143 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174473675354 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654317292768 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428599456413 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114431807787 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355405546124 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.