The maps compares the current airport with the next year plan.
Overall, the plan are mainly involves rearranging and expanding some emendities in the airport.
The current map of the airport shows that the departures and arrivals gate both only have 1 gate while in the propose plan they will be adding 1 more gate for departures and arrvals in order to curb overcrowded people during busy days. In the departures sector, the check-in booth will be relocated to the right side of the sector while the bag drop will be at the old position of the check in booth, and the cafe will also be relocated from the top right side of the departures sector to the bottom left near the departures gate. The shops will be added after the security booth.
On the arrivals sector, the atm, the cafe and car hire will be added to accommodate new arrivals with the cafe and atm will be on the right side of the sector while the car hire will be added on the small expanded part of the sector on the lower right. The current airport has 8 gate in total both for departures and arrial, and also a walkway to help with both people who are departing and arriving. In the propose plan, the airport will be adding more gate with the total of 18 gates with the first 9 gates is for departures sector and the last 9 gates will be for arrival sectors, and the walkway will be replaced with a sky train to accommodate both sector.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'compare'.
Suggestion: compare
The maps compares the current airport with the next year ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...als gate both only have 1 gate while in the propose plan they will be adding 1 more gate fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'departures'' or 'departure's'?
Suggestion: departures'; departure's
...crowded people during busy days. In the departures sector, the check-in booth will be relo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'departures'' or 'departure's'?
Suggestion: departures'; departure's
...elocated from the top right side of the departures sector to the bottom left near the depa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arrivals'' or 'arrival's'?
Suggestion: arrivals'; arrival's
...added after the security booth. On the arrivals sector, the atm, the cafe and car hire ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gate' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'gates'.
Suggestion: gates
... lower right. The current airport has 8 gate in total both for departures and arrial...
^^^^
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ople who are departing and arriving. In the propose plan, the airport will be adding more g...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 634, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accommodating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accommodating
...lkway will be replaced with a sky train to accommodate both sector.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40229885057 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23602530467 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425287356322 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.3369448799 43.030603864 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 143.625 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.625 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.083671449775 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794660515351 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128823624816 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136894129589 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159355722372 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.