It is true that the advancement of technology has improved many aspect of people lives and helped brings people with social applications. With the current technology advancement, the youth can accidentally put themselves in a dangerous situations when they surf the web without parents or guardians supervised. There are several solutions I can think of that could help solve the problems.
Social media can be a benificial and crucial for teenagers daily life but can pose as a hidden threat that they might not know about. Mainly, with anonymity of the web, the youth could interact with many people on the web whether they are friends and family or a stranger they met online. People that they met online might not have good intention and could manipulate and induct teenagers into a gang or a cult potentially harm and scar them for the rest of their lives. For instance, heaven’s gate is a cult start in the early days of the internet and had brainwashed many adult and teenagers alike into their religious group. In addition, hackers are still prevelent on the web, with the thrive of technology has provided engineers with tools that could benefit society and also provided hackers with tools of their own to hack into a system. Malware and virus can disguised in many form on the web, the youth might be curious and accidentally install virus into their computer systems. For example, the infamous mydoom malware had caused sizeable damage on finace.
But there are several solution that parents and guardians could implement. Firstly, install a website extension that remove advertisement pop up on the web preventing teenagers accidentally click on them and allow malware and virus in. Secondly, parental figures could add an application preventing teenagers to go website that can pose a threat to them. Nowadays, there are many helpful application that guardians could install and forbid youngsters from accessing them. Finally, limit time that the youth could use the internet and social media to encourage adolescent spending more time with family and friends. So that, they could avoid strangers with bad intention.
In conclusion, various measures can be taken to tackle the problems of the youth surfing the web without parental figures supervised.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun aspect seems to be countable; consider using: 'many aspects'.
Suggestion: many aspects
... advancement of technology has improved many aspect of people lives and helped brings peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'situation'?
Suggestion: situation
...identally put themselves in a dangerous situations when they surf the web without parents ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 570, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun adult seems to be countable; consider using: 'many adults'.
Suggestion: many adults
...ays of the internet and had brainwashed many adult and teenagers alike into their religiou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 687, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rs are still prevelent on the web, with the thrive of technology has provided engineers wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun solution seems to be countable; consider using: 'several solutions'.
Suggestion: several solutions
...eable damage on finace. But there are several solution that parents and guardians could implem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12668463612 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64570050927 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501347708895 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1775630107 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.882352941 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17044482141 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571756508144 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035699237227 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118206883932 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227483306475 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.