In modern times, new version of a product release on a yearly basis, and many of the advertisement of the products are mainly focus on it new features. There is a reason for this trend and I believe it is a negative development.
Many product advertisements have emphasise on their product new features because they want the customers to buy their new products. These companies have spent majority of their budgets into designing, creating and manufacturing these products, which can affect their revenue in that year. Thus, their advertisement needs to focus on the products new features so that the customers, especially younger demographics, will buy them, and they can recupperate their loss. For instance, the advertisement of Cyberpunk 2077, which is a video game made by Red Barrel, had made many players around the world feels excited, and were willing to buy the game.
However, I believe this is a negative development. This is because some companies are notorious for deceiving their clients by not showing them a complete picture of the product, which mean they only show the features that got polished while the rest of the product can be low quality or reuse older version. For example, Apple, which is a tech company, are notorious for selling over-priced smartphones with small adjustment and look identical to the previous iterations.
In conclusion, marketing are focusing on new features of a product in their advertisement so that they can recupperate their net loss, and I believe it is a negative development since company can deceive customers into buying their over-priced products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'focused', 'focussed'.
Suggestion: focused; focussed
...dvertisement of the products are mainly focus on it new features. There is a reason f...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'emphasised'.
Suggestion: emphasised
...ment. Many product advertisements have emphasise on their product new features because t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tomers, especially younger demographics, will buy them, and they can recupperate ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15267175573 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94484385922 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526717557252 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.3558337287 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301276292561 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135209880218 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895634035685 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19826510716 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521926191559 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.