The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons

The line graphs illustrate the percentage of household that own electrical appliances and the number of hours spent on chores around the house in one country from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, the percentage of house hold appliances increased during this period while the hours of household chores had a sharp decrease, the number of refrigerator was lower than washing machine and vacuum cleaner but had a rapid increase in 2019 while washing machine became the lowest in 2019.
In 1920, the number of Refrigerator was around 4 percent while Vacuum cleaner and Washing machine was 30 and 40 percent respectively. Both of these figures had a noticable increase in 1960 with around 70 percent each. The percentage of Refrigerator had a sharp increased from around 4 percent to 90 percent in 1960. This number continue to increase and peaked at 100 percent in 2019.
The number of Vacuum cleaner had a sharp increase after 1960 and peaked at 100 percent in 2019 while Washing machine only only had a slight increase around 75 percent in 2019. The number of household chores was around 50 hours in 1920 but this number continue to drop until 2019 where it remain around 10 percent.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: only
...0 percent in 2019 while Washing machine only only had a slight increase around 75 percent...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'remains'?
Suggestion: remains
...er continue to drop until 2019 where it remain around 10 percent.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86069651741 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52898839116 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412935323383 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5476683535 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0907954899164 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552518251594 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671628233397 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915059634346 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773876632361 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.