The bar graph compares a country Export Earnings in different categories between 2015 and 2016 while the table graph illustrates the changes in value of different categories of export from 2015 to 2016.
Overall, in the bar graph, we can see Petroleum products have the highest earning in both years while Textiles have the lowest. In the table graph, Textiles value have the highest while Agricultural products value have the lowest .
In 2015, Petroleum Products had around 61 billions with Engineered goods, and Gems and jewellery had around 58 and 42 billions respectively. Agricultural products had around 31 billions in 2015 while Textiles had the lowest figures with only around 27 billions. In 2016, the figures of Petroleum Products and Engineered Goods experienced a slight increased with 63 billions and 61 billions individually. Gems and jewellry had a slight decreased from 42 billions to 41 billions, Agricultural Products remained the same while Textiles had a noticeable increased from 27 billions to 31 billions.
The value of Petroleum products experienced 3 percent increased from 2015 to 2016. Engineered also had 8.5 percent increased while Gems and jewellry had 5.18 percent decreased, Angricultural products and Textiles both had increased with 0.81 and 15.24 percent respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...icultural products value have the lowest . In 2015, Petroleum Products had around...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44827586207 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91562429883 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4039408867 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2003401346 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161967892929 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913295666901 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120782327363 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141707027133 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153977888069 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.