The average annual expenditure of college students from three countries
The table gives information about the expenses that students in 3 countries spend on 5 distinct categories every year.
Overall, the total expenditure of students from country A was the highest and country C was the lowest. Whereas accommodation and food both accounted for the largest proportion per total of 3 nations, the money that students use for leisure in country A and B was higher than books, in contrast to country C.
College students in 3 countries spend the highest amount of their budget on housing with 45%, 35% and 30% of country A, B and C, respectively. Coming in the second place in the rank was food expenses, while accommodation in country A takes the highest percentage among 3 nations, foods expenditure of this country however was the lowest with 22%, compares with 28% of country B and 36% of country C.
In spite of high total expenses, the money that students use for books in country A and B was much lower than that percentage of leisure with 3% and 9% compares with 22% and 23%, respectively. By contrast, the proportion of expenditure of students from country C on books was 21%, which was nearly double of 12% on leisure. The money spend on others was also high in country A with 8% and low in country C with just 1%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A take' or simply 'takes'?
Suggestion: A take; Takes
...xpenses, while accommodation in country A takes the highest percentage among 3 nations,...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...rly double of 12% on leisure. The money spend on others was also high in country A wi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to, in spite of, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63392857143 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71146469944 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455357142857 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9598904833 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279551739306 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161163545025 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709593612193 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190778250097 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485988316556 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.