average monthly spend on children's sports in Britain
The line charts depict the amount of money consumed for children's sports every month by British parents, and the number of young participants in swimming, athletics, and football from 2008 to 2014.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the monthly spending on children's sports in the examined years. While more and more children took part in the three sports activities, football attracted the highest volume of attendees in the whole period.
As can be seen from the first chart, accounting for only 20 pounds per month in 2008, the money poured into sports for children increased dramatically, climbing to its peak at over 32 pounds in 2014. This resulted in the rising number of kids in sports activities.
In 2008, in contrast to a large number of football attendees, with 7.5 million, those for swimming and athletics were both under 2.5 million. In the next years, regardless of its insignificant decline in 2010, football was still the most popular activity for children with nearly 9 million players in 2014. Meanwhile, after a 2-year period of stability, the number of youngsters involved in athletics plummeted to 5 million in 2012, surpassing the figure of swimming, followed by a marginal decrease in 2014. Swimming was the only activity to experience a continual increase in its participants, soaring to its highest point in 2014 at about 3.5 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ts activities. In 2008, in contrast to a large number of football attendees, with 7.5 million, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts, soaring to its highest point in 2014 at about 3.5 million.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05752212389 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7335859183 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58407079646 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9219284921 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198611973665 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957847304845 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101349820912 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153452759415 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09410592264 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.