The bar chart below gives information about four countries spending habits of shopping on consumer goods in 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the prevalence of various types of consumer products across four nations in 2012. All in all, the data differ significantly.
As shown in the information registered in 2012, cameras were in the dominant position in British consumer market. In fact, the British spent a staggering 170,000 pounds on cameras, exceeding its counterpart in Belgium, which saw the demand at 145,000 pounds. Likewise, the distinctions in toys and books between these two countries were in line with that of cameras, whereby its British figures standing at over 165,000 and over 160,000 in toys and books respectively. By contrast, both Spain and Austria witnessed a demand overtaking Belgium in both books, toys and cameras, despite the fact that they were surpassed by Britain.
In stark contrast, a different pattern was found in the remaining categories in 2012. In comparison to other countries, Britain saw the highest demand in cosmetics, outdoor game accessories and console games, while Austria invariably positioned at the bottom.
Overall, among these six categories, the British generally spent more than its peer countries in 2012.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40555555556 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80904073957 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627777777778 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7767441749 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104488869077 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485133218911 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589251918704 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677724403823 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354905873428 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.