The bar chart below gives information about the trends in landline telephone ownership in different countries.
The bar chart demonstrates the changes of the number of landline telephones in nine countries over a five-year period from 2000 to 2004.
According to the graph, the trends in number of landline telephones per thousand of population varied in different countries. Generally, these figures decreased in countries with higher ownership of landline telephones, while increased lightly in those with lower numbers.
Singapore had been witnessing the highest number of landline telephone ownership over the five years, with over 450 per thousand of the population in 2000. Even with a gentle drop to approximately 430 landline telephones per thousand, its ownership rate was still ranked top.
In Brunei Darussalam, the second highest ownership rates were recorded, and the numbers fluctuated around 250 per thousand across the five years.
Cambodia and Vietnam, with lower levels of landline telephone ownership, saw a different pattern in these figures, increasing rather than decreasing. In the remaining countries, all the figures stayed below the 100 per thousand level between 2000 and 2004.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62874251497 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81322438092 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580838323353 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.8700779771 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271203777172 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125694124909 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635642263598 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154431087942 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679809675456 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.