The bar chart below shoes the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007.
The bar chart illustrates the information about total hours spend per week by teenagers in Chester with several activities such as, watching television, watching DVDs and others from 2002 to 2007 at 01-year intervals.
Overall, it can be seen that higher number of hours was spend to watching television and watching DVDs. While, tendency of bowling and doing sports were minimal activity among adolescents in whole period.
Teenagers spent 25 hours on watching television in 2002 which increased gradually and reached almost 40 hours a week in the last year. Although, below the 15 hours teenagers spent their time with DVDs in 2002, but, after which it dropped it down approximately 05 hours till 2007. Furthermore, going to pubs and disco was slightly rose and then remained stable from 2004 to 2006 and increased more or less 10 hours in the final year.
At Last, bowling was under 05 hours throughout the entire time period whereas; shopping, dong homework and doing sports were greatly higher than bowling with slightly fluctuation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...be seen that higher number of hours was spend to watching television and watching DVD...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, then, whereas, while, such as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16470588235 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5489260918 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.8904875685 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.333333333 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33731588353 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160347990587 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111726653653 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190233329287 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126266746637 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.