The bar chart below show how frequently the adolescents eat doughnuts in Texas.
The bar graph compares the proportion of how often adolescent female and male groups eat doughnuts in Texas.
Overall, it is clear that there is a higher percentage of both gender who eat doughnuts occasionally, while only a small number eats them everyday.
By far, the total adolescent girls that eat doughnuts occasionally accounts to 65% and it has a difference of just above a fifth for their counterpart who eats it occasionally. Similarly, girls are leading in a once a month frequency of eating the pastry at less than a fifth, whereas the boys who consume donuts once per month is only at one in ten of the total proportion. In contrast, the percentage of boys who never eats them compared to the girls is almost half at 15% and 8%, respectively.
Meanwhile, both gender had a similar ratio at 7% for eating the pastry once a week. On the other hand, a difference of 2% for consuming those donuts twice a week dominates the group of girls, which is also at 7%. Apparently, the total proportion of boys and girls who consumes it everyday is at 3% for the former and 2% for the latter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ly, while only a small number eats them everyday. By far, the total adolescent girls...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...rtion of boys and girls who consumes it everyday is at 3% for the former and 2% for the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59390862944 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74558763046 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4882226274 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178835131424 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964401187433 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113780900913 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154098403232 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12606057415 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.